Lardiere McNair & Stonebrook, Ltd.
An entity set up and run properly CAN protect a sole shareholder/member
LARDIEREMCNAIR
October 14, 2014

Sole control of a corporation, by itself, is insufficient to establish that the corporate veil should be pierced. To find that such a scheme creates an automatic right to pierce the corporate veil would virtually undue all small businesses functioning as LLCs or sub-chapter S corporations. The true issue is not dominion and control, but whether the shareholder was the "alter ego" of the corporation.

In Erb Poultry, Inc. v. CEME, LLC, the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County (October 10, 2014) held that the corporate veil should not be pierced even when the sole shareholder of a corporation issues stop payment orders on checks. Erb Poultry, Inc. v. CEME, LLC, 2014-Ohio-4504.

A corporation is a separate legal entity from its shareholders even where there is only one shareholder in the corporation. Zimmerman v. Eagle Mtge. Corp., 110 Ohio App.3d 762, 675 N.E.2d 480 (2d Dist. 1996). Therefore, shareholders, officers, and directors will generally not be held personally liable for the acts of a corporation. Charvat v. Farmers Ins. Columbus, Inc., 178 Ohio App.3d 118, 2008-Ohio-4353, 897 N.E.2d 167, ¶21 (10th Dist.). However, in certain circumstances, the corporate form may be disregarded and the corporate veil may be pierced. Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners' Assn. v. RE. Roark Cos., Inc., 67 Ohio St.3d 274, 287, 617 N.E.2d 1075 (1993). In order to reach the personal assets of the corporation's individual shareholders, the creditor must show that "(1) control over the corporation by those to be held liable was so complete that the corporation has no separate mind, will, or existence of its own, (2) control over the corporation by those to be held liable was exercised in such a manner as to commit fraud or an illegal act against the person seeking to disregard the corporate entity, and (3) injury or unjust loss resulted to the plaintiff from such control and wrong." Id. at 289. The burden of proving these elements rested with Erb. Zimmerman at 772.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free Consultation

Law is a complicated matter. It can cause you a big problem if you ignore it. Let us help you!

"*" indicates required fields

Notice: If you send e-mail to Lardiere McNair & Stonebrook, LLC in connection with a matter for which we do not already represent you, your communication may not be treated as privileged, confidential or otherwise protected because you are not a client. If you communicate with us by e-mail in connection with a matter for which we already represent you, please remember that Internet e-mail may not be secure. **
Notice: If you send e-mail to Lardiere McNair & Stonebrook, LLC in connection with a matter for which we do not already represent you, your communication may not be treated as privileged, confidential or otherwise protected because you are not a client. If you communicate with us by e-mail in connection with a matter for which we already represent you, please remember that Internet e-mail may not be secure. *

At Lardiere McNair & Stonebrook, we recognize that we are here to provide more than just quality legal service to our clients.
Copyright Lardiere McNair & Stonebrook, LLC 2022
Privacy Policy & Terms of Use
bubblecrossmenuchevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram