Lardiere McNair DiNicola & Stonebrook Ltd
Equal Treatment of Employees May Not Equal Religious Accommodation
LARDIEREMCNAIR
June 5, 2015

The Supreme Court of the United States ruled on Monday June 1, in favor of a woman who sued Abercrombie & Fitch over religious discrimination. The woman alleged that the clothing company did not hire her because of her religious head covering. Many Muslim women choose to wear a head covering called a hijab, and the Columbus-based clothing company argued that the covering was against their dress policy.

The Court ruled 8-1 in favor of the woman, and said that Abercrombie & Fitch failed to accommodate a job applicant’s religious needs. Also of note, the Court stated that the woman need not prove that Abercrombie & Fitch knew that the headscarf was worn for religious reasons, only that the headscarf was actually worn for religious reasons.

Abercrombie argued in the case that their policy was neutral. All employees had to abide by the same rules, so it could not be intentional discrimination. The Court disagreed. “But Title VII does not demand mere neutrality with regard to religious practices—that they be treated no worse than other practices. Rather, it gives them favored treatment, affirmatively obligating employers not ‘to fail or refuse to hire or discharge any individual…because of such individual’s religious observance or practice.’ An employer is surely entitled to have, for example, a no-headwear policy as an ordinary matter. But when an applicant requires an accommodation as an aspect of religious practice, it is no response that the subsequent failure to hire was due to an otherwise-neutral policies to give way to the need for an accommodation.”

Employers need to consider the Supreme Court’s ruling when determining their hiring practices, religious accommodations, and other employment policies. Employers with questions should contact an attorney.

A full copy of the decision by the Court can be found at: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-86_p86b.pdf

Chad Stonebrook is an Associate Attorney at Lardiere McNair LLC.  Lardiere McNair LLC has a practice in which advises and assists both employers and employees with their employment concerns. To read more about Chad, please visit http://www.lmcounsel.com/chads-bio.html.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free Consultation

Law is a complicated matter. It can cause you a big problem if you ignore it. Let us help you!

"*" indicates required fields

Notice: If you send e-mail to Lardiere McNair DiNicola & Stonebrook, LLC in connection with a matter for which we do not already represent you, your communication may not be treated as privileged, confidential or otherwise protected because you are not a client. If you communicate with us by e-mail in connection with a matter for which we already represent you, please remember that Internet e-mail may not be secure. **
Notice: If you send e-mail to Lardiere McNair DiNicola & Stonebrook, LLC in connection with a matter for which we do not already represent you, your communication may not be treated as privileged, confidential or otherwise protected because you are not a client. If you communicate with us by e-mail in connection with a matter for which we already represent you, please remember that Internet e-mail may not be secure. *

lardiere_McNair
At Lardiere McNair DiNicola & Stonebrook, we recognize that we are here to provide more than just quality legal service to our clients.
Copyright Lardiere McNair DiNicola & Stonebrook, LLC 2022
Privacy Policy & Terms of Use
bubblecrossmenuchevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram