lardiere_McNair
Supreme Court Recognizes Disparate Impact Under the Fair Housing Act
LARDIEREMCNAIR
July 13, 2015

lm square logo blue

In one of its most recent decisions, the Supreme Court held that housing practices can be unlawful based on their discriminatory effect, even if there is no discriminatory purpose. The Fair Housing Act (FHA) makes it unlawful to “refuse to sell or rent…or otherwise make unavailable or deny” housing to a person based on race or any other protected characteristic. The lawsuit alleged that a Texas state agency had caused segregated housing patterns because the agency gave too many tax credits to developers in mostly minority inner-city neighborhoods and too few credits in the mostly white suburbs.

The Supreme Court found that unlawful practices under the FHA include housing restrictions that function unfairly to exclude minorities from certain neighborhoods and communities without sufficient justification. The Court did, however, hold that if the plaintiff relies on a statistical disparity without being able show that the policy caused the disparity, the claim would fail. The Court additionally limited the decision so that housing authorities and private developers can make practical business choices and profit-related decisions without being drawn into litigation.

So while the Supreme Court held that housing practices can be unlawful when they have a discriminatory effect, housing authorities and developers may continue the practice if they can prove it is necessary to achieve a valid interest and that there is not a less discriminatory alternative. Additionally, any plaintiff must be able to show that the housing practice caused the disparity, so housing authorities and developers won’t be held liable for racial disparities they didn’t create.

Joe Burke is a law clerk at Lardiere McNair, LLC. To read more about Joe and our firm, please visit www.lmcounsel.com.

The information presented here has been prepared by Lardiere McNair for promotional and informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice.  This information is not intended to provide, and receipt of it does not constitute, legal advice.  Nor does the receipt of this material create an attorney/client relationship.  An attorney client relationship is not established until such time as Lardiere McNair enters in to a written engagement agreement with a specific client for a specific legal matter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Free Consultation

Law is a complicated matter. It can cause you a big problem if you ignore it. Let us help you!
Notice: If you send e-mail to Lardiere McNair, LLC in connection with a matter for which we do not already represent you, your communication may not be treated as privileged, confidential or otherwise protected because you are not a client. If you communicate with us by e-mail in connection with a matter for which we already represent you, please remember that Internet e-mail may not be secure. **
Notice: If you send e-mail to Lardiere McNair, LLC in connection with a matter for which we do not already represent you, your communication may not be treated as privileged, confidential or otherwise protected because you are not a client. If you communicate with us by e-mail in connection with a matter for which we already represent you, please remember that Internet e-mail may not be secure. *
lardiere_McNair

At Lardiere McNair, we recognize that we are here to provide more than just quality legal service to our clients.

Copyright Lardiere McNair, LLC 2022
Privacy Policy & Terms of Use
bubblecrossmenuchevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram